Rsc_cp_c3cp50308a 3..4
نویسندگان
چکیده
In their perspective ‘‘Computational studies on organic reactivity in ionic liquids’’ Chiappe and Pomelli have written a short paragraph excluding COSMO-RS as a potential method for estimating reaction thermodynamics in ionic liquids. They write: ‘‘COSMO-RS, a model based on a simplified version of the polarizable continuummodel, which is strongly parameterized, has been used to estimate the thermodynamics of a solvent. However, this model is unable to give a precise physical description of the system and the parameterization set does not include reaction barriers; therefore, COSMO-RS is not suitable for reactivity studies.’’ Since the authors reference just one out of many application papers by COSMO-RS users and do not give conclusive reasoning for their statement, we feel the necessity to comment on the usability of COSMO-RS for estimating reaction thermodynamics and kinetics in ionic liquid media. As a matter of fact, COSMO-RS is based on the Conductorlike Screening Model (COSMO), and COSMO is – although developed independently – a simpler and thus numerically more efficient continuum solvation model than the polarizable continuum model. Nevertheless it must be pointed out that there is no proof in the literature that the conceptual simplifications of COSMO have any negative influence on the quality of results. Instead, it turned out to be more accurate with respect to the outlying charge problem, and for that reason the COSMO boundary condition has even been integrated into the polarizable continuum model as C-PCM. COSMO-RS is a combination of COSMO – used in its limit of the perfect conductor – and a statistical thermodynamics of pair-wise interacting surface segments, where the surface interactions are quantified based on the COSMO polarization charge densities. By that COSMO-RS treats solutes and solvents on the same quantum chemical footing, and introduces the concepts of mixtures and temperature dependence in a natural, thermodynamically consistent way. As a result it does not require any chemistry dependent parameters for the solvents, which in almost all other solvation models require special parameterization. Altogether COSMO-RS thus has less adjustable parameters than most other solvation models. If the authors want to claim the opposite, they shall clearly demonstrate this claim. Quite surely COSMO-RS overall has by far less adjustable parameters than the specially adapted IL-force fields required for the QM/MM, recommended as the method of choice in this perspective. COSMO-RS has been proven in a large number of application papers to be well applicable to study solvation thermodynamics in ionic liquids, even though initially completely parameterized on neutral compounds and solvents. A GoogleScholar search for ‘‘Ionic Liquids’’ in combination with ‘‘COSMO-RS’’ yields 874 hits as of Nov. 29, 2012. On the other hand, COSMO-RS has been proven to be applicable to study reaction thermodynamics and reaction kinetics in solution. Very recently, various authors have reported the application of COSMO-RS to the study of chemical absorption of CO2 in ionic liquids. The trends predicted for the thermodynamic properties of different ILs using COSMO-RS, such as CO2 solubility, reaction enthalpy, and solvent reversal temperature, were verified by experimental data. These results suggest that COSMO-RS can be successfully used to predict reaction thermodynamics in systems involving ILs, providing a useful computational tool for the development of new CO2 absorbents. To our knowledge, COSMO-RS applications to estimate reaction a COSMOlogic GmbH&CoKG, Burscheider Str. 515, 51381 Leverkusen, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: +49 2171 731681 b Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Regensburg, Germany c Polymer Physics and Analytics, BASF SE, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany d Sección de Ingenierı́a Quı́mica (Departamento de Quı́mica Fı́sica Aplicada), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain Received 22nd January 2013, Accepted 26th April 2013
منابع مشابه
Comportamento da criança
" ( %+#+& $ (* 1$*$ $#2( ,-$" (" /3+% $ 1$* $% +*(4 $ 3+ 1%,+45+ +$ "(% "/#*( ,3+ + -,3($4+"$6+%,4'$&+%,4'$"1$ ,+ 7 ( + (6,1,841,+ 3+ %$ ,4+ +3$ +3+ (&$" +/ $%(" +%+ "/+ %(+&,9+5:$ 7 ( 3("1%(-(% + %$ ,4+ 3$ (;+*(< 1$4 %,#/,43$ +%+ "/+ *(& $% (;(1/5:$ $% $/ %$" %$6,"",$4+," 3+ =%(+ *>3,1+! %$" (1 ,-$ 1&?4,1$ %+43$*,9+3$ ! !" %("(4 ( (" /3$ 6$, %(+&,9+3$ 1$* 1%,+45+" ( +3$&("1(4 ("< 1/2+ 6+,;+ ( ...
متن کاملA System for Dissolved oxygen Control in Industrial aeration tank
3 4 5 65 37 5 383 3 9 : : 3 5 3 ; 4 4 9 55 83 6 34 4 34 : 4 4 4 5 : :3 : 4 :4 < :53 4 : : : 4 9 = 4 3 73;8: 6 4 64:7 5 9 3 4 3 355 * 3 4 3 : : : 4 : 7 393 5 3 355 5 : 3 7 3 ;<:53 :4593 9 4 4 : 9 5 :4 35 4 355 64:7 5 < 6 : 4 3 9 4 4 : :73 3 5 4; 43 7 3:5 3734 5 9 355 8: :< 35 :4 3 4 3 4 4 35 383 3 9 6 : 5 3 :4593 9 4 4 7 3 5 * 3 4 5 65 37 :5 4835 : 3 8 : 7 3 5 7 : 4 9 3 55 83 6 34 4 34 : 4 53 ; ...
متن کاملA Usability Evaluation Framework for Web Mashup Makers for End-Users
ion Gradient 4 3 4 5 3 4 4 3 Closeness of mapping 4 4 3 3 3 5 5 4 Consistency 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 Diffuseness 4 4 3 4 5 4 4 4 Error-proneness 2 1 3 2 3 2 2 1 Hard mental operations 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 Hidden dependencies 3 4 3 4 2 4 4 4 Premature commitment 4 4 2 5 4 3 4 4 Progressive evaluation 1 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 Role-expressiveness 4 3 4 5 4 3 4 3 Secondary notation 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 Viscosity 4 4 3 5 3 2...
متن کاملWork supported in part by US Department of Energy contract DE-AC02-76SF00515
! " " # $$ $ " ! $$ ! # ! " ## !$ % & ' ( ) * + #, + $ * ./ / , 0 1 . 2 ) " ( '. & 3 # ( + , , % ! ( #/ " ## " + " ## +, 4 $ $ 2 4 5/. 2 % 5, $ ) 2 1 , 0 / . 2 0 . 2 $ 2 + / , 2 & ,. 2 " $ / % + .)/ .6 " " $. " # % # . ( #* 3 / 7 1 ! " # ! 8 , * * ! " ( ! % + 2 $ ./ % 4 ,* " ( , + ) ! 3 .* " # 5 , $. , ** 1 3 # * ( , ! % % $$ , % ( #$ 1 !* !. $. $ 7 # 4 . # 4 " % ) 2 " $$ " ' " % . $ 9 $ * 3 7 ...
متن کاملSupplement to Internally 4-connected projective-planar graphs
A5 = {{1, 2}, {1, 3}, {1, 4}, {1, 5}, {2, 3}, {2, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 4}, {3, 5}, {4, 5}, {6, 7}, {6, 8}, {6, 9}, {6, 10}, {7, 8}, {7, 9}, {7, 10}, {8, 9}, {8, 10}, {9, 10}} C11 = {{1, 2}, {1, 3}, {1, 4}, {1, 5}, {2, 3}, {2, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 4}, {3, 5}, {4, 5}, {6, 9}, {6, 10}, {6, 11}, {7, 9}, {7, 10}, {7, 11}, {8, 9}, {8, 10}, {8, 11}} E42 = {{1, 4}, {1, 5}, {1, 6}, {2, 4}, {2, 5}, {2, 6}, {3, 4},...
متن کاملAdditional file 5.xlsx
position -4 C50 C49 C48 C47 C46 C45 C44 C43 C42 C41 C40 C39 C38 C37 C36 C35 C34 C33 C32 C31 C30 C29 C28 C27 C26 C25 C24 C23 C22 C21 C20 C19 C18 C17 C16 C15 C14 C13 C12 C11 C10 C9 C8 C7 C6 C5 C4 C3 C2 C1 C0 C-index SD P-value mark A 5 7 9 1 8 4 6 2 1 4 8 7 6 9 3 4 3 7 15 10 6 6 9 3 2 5 3 6 8 9 6 3 5 7 7 10 4 7 7 8 5 5 8 2 2 3 1 2 5 5 9 0.618 0.317 8.27E-03 n.s. A C 3 1 2 0 2 3 3 1 1 2 1 7 4 9 1 ...
متن کامل